


Please share this video with EVERYBODY! http://freedomforip.org/ Recently, we sat down with Brian Rowe and Marcus Barnes-Cannon to discuss Protect IP and what it actually means to not only our community, but anyone that uses the Internet. Brian Rowe (http://twitter.com/#!/sarterus) is a profe... More
Please share this video with EVERYBODY! http://freedomforip.org/
Recently, we sat down with Brian Rowe and Marcus Barnes-Cannon to discuss Protect IP and what it actually means to not only our community, but anyone that uses the Internet.
Brian Rowe (http://twitter.com/#!/sart
erus) is a professor and long-time contributor to nonprofits supporting IP. Currently, he is working with the National Justice Project while teaching at Seattle University School of Law and the University of Washington.
Marcus Barnes-Cannon is a third-year law student at the Seattle University School of Law with a focus on intellectual property. He recently spoke at Gnomedex as part of the Seattle Interactive Conference on the matter of Protect IP and its impact on both commercial and non-commercial users.
The Protect IP Act is a set of legislation that would dramatically change the way the government and copyright holders handle potentially infringing sites. If the DoJ or the copyright holder deems a site in violation, they would have the authority to go directly to various search engines, domain registrars, and social networking sites to have the site pretty much blocked from anyone being able to access it. This, of course, prior to any trial or due process that one might imagine needing to come before such a drastic action takes place.
You can read the legislation for yourself here:
http://www.opencongress.org/bi
ll/112-s968/
SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) is a counter legislation currently being proposed in the House which takes a different (yet equally drastic) approach to combating piracy. By granting the copyright holders the ability to cut off the funding of these sites by directly contacting their advertisers and financial institutions, the RIAA or MPAA would essentially have the power to put you out of business if they deem your site in violation of copyright.
You can read the Stop Online Piracy Act yourself here:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/
query/z?c112:H.R.3261:
With either legislative proposal, the media conglomerates, RIAA, and MPAA would essentially have the power to shut businesses down without due process. Imagine having the fate of your site determined by the same legal bodies that have prosecuted children and put their families out of house and home because they installed a program like Kazaa on their parent's system without knowing the implications. If this is the type of drastic legal action they would take to a kid, imagine how quickly this same body would respond to a site that may be equally infringing, whether they know it or not.
http://www.lockergnome.com/new
s/2011/11/12/stop-online-piracy-act-warner-br
os-and-the-loss-of-due-process/ Less
Added Nov 19, 2011
Channel Tech
Duration 19:48 | views 33179
Local Comments 0
Youtube Comments 499
Rating:
Tags protect ip intellectual property rights law sopa piracy act house senate school government america
Permalink:




Post a comment
Local Comments (0)
Youtube Comments (499)
DumDumFilm Says:
May 20, 2012 - I used to be free on the internet, until I took a SOPA to the knee. This is where I find out knee jokes are copyrighted and I'm going to get a knock at the door.
QuakerRaze Says:
Mar 15, 2012 - Sopa spelt backwards is... Apos = A piece of shit
QuakerRaze Says:
Mar 15, 2012 - [S]ome [O]dinary [P]olitical [A]ssholes
raders09 Says:
Mar 12, 2012 - Several individuals and entities allegedly involved in the operation of **********.com will be charged with the following charges. hahahahahah note: to the American Government your laws do not effect anyone who is not a American citizen S.O.P.A is more of a inconvenience than a act of law.
L4DHunter7 Says:
Mar 8, 2012 - why is it that always some things try to take away our freedom this is our internet
ohgodthatsgottahurt Says:
Feb 13, 2012 - Comment removed by SOPA.
Squeredead Says:
Feb 8, 2012 - You can't upload this it's copyright lol
Daisydearden9960 Says:
Feb 2, 2012 - (╯°□°)╯︵ ∀ԀOS
grizzlykuma Says:
Jan 26, 2012 - ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅHHHHHHHHHHHH SOPA!
NekoTakoyaki Says:
Jan 25, 2012 - why have we got things like SOPA, ACTA & PIPA, when we don't even have proper potato peelers? -__-"
RnRfarmer Says:
Jan 23, 2012 - I think the greatest danger is that of false flag operations... If someone is speaking up to say, Fox News on a blog and gets allot of attention... Then Fox could start up 50 blogs from the same blog provider and fill them with copyrighted material.. And then have the ENTIRE blog provider shut down with every single blog on it.. And the government could actually do the same thing.. Don't like Guantanamo? Well i heard you got copyrighted material.. BOOM.. Silence...
vegito1325 Says:
Jan 23, 2012 - real talk people dont control shit thats goverments can sya we going to war when we dont even know thers a situation going on
eahaddixscomments Says:
Jan 23, 2012 - Please direct your anti-SOPA/PIPA rage to ©reativeamerica's YouTube and Facebook profiles and their website blog. They need to know that their pro-SOPA/PIPA propaganda treadmill and flagrant denial of the facts will not help them pass "SOPA 2.0" next month or later. "©reativeamerica United to Fight Content Theft" youtube[.]com[/]user[/]creativeamerica facebook[.]com[/]creativeamerica blog[.]creativeamerica[.]org
crashdog5866 Says:
Jan 23, 2012 - What people don't consider is that people like me make a living based on record companies ability to make money. If I build a car and then sell it I don't have the right to let other people use that car. It's the same thing with music. Writers write songs and sell the licences to publishing companies and record labels. I still wrote the song but now the licence is the property of the publishing company. I don't have the right to send that song to rap review sights to have the review it.
LesbionBF Says:
Jan 21, 2012 - The fight is not over guys! We need your support again! ACTA, is an international trade agreement currently negociated by the European Union, the United States, Japan, Canada, South Korea, Australia as well as a few other countries, whose aim is to enforce copyright and tackle counterfeited goods (hence its acronym: Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). Please thumbs this up to help raise awareness. It is worse then SOPA and will be passed in 6 days. It has been behind doors for years.
proteusn7xr Says:
Jan 21, 2012 - There are laws that apply only to the legal classification know as a "Corporation". If a group of people are a "Corporation", this makes it easier to govern their activities related to revenue, taxes and employment laws if you can treat this "group" as a single entity. Similar rules apply to other business "classes" like LLC (Limited Liability Company) and Partnerships and Sole Proprietor. All for the same reasons.
proteusn7xr Says:
Jan 21, 2012 - Now anyone can become a "Corporation." A "Corporation" is simply a legal classification for a group of people. This group can consist of one or more people. That's right. One person can be a Corporation. I should know, I am. It has more to do with tax law than anything else. It is simply a "handle" so to speak, that the tax laws can "grab" onto. Its a way of taking a group of people and treating them all the same with respect to taxes.
proteusn7xr Says:
Jan 21, 2012 - A little more about Corporations: You think of a corporation as some mega wealthy, semi government with an ability to make laws. A corporation typically consists of a concrete and metal building, offices, desks, tables, chairs, and people. Now remove the people and what do you have left? Nothing. Corporations are just a group of people.
proteusn7xr Says:
Jan 21, 2012 - Democracy and Capitalism are two different things. Democracy is a system of government. Capitalism is a system of economics. Yes, these two do influence each other in some ways. Perhaps that is what you where trying to say...
proteusn7xr Says:
Jan 21, 2012 - With Communism, the government has total control. The government may decide to tell you what your major will be in college, based on their determination of what skill sets the country needs. They determine where you live, where you work, how many children you can have, where and when you can travel.
proteusn7xr Says:
Jan 21, 2012 - Capitalism means you work a job generating as much income as your intellect allows, and the benefit you recieve from this work is directly proportional to your accomplishments.
proteusn7xr Says:
Jan 21, 2012 - Here are some very simple definitions: marxisim = put in what you can, get out what you need capitalism = you get out what you put in communism = put in what you are told to put in and the government decides what you need. Marxism, as defined by Karl Marx, "from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs." This means that you work a job generating as much income as your intellect allows, but your pay will be the same as anyone else.
proteusn7xr Says:
Jan 21, 2012 - What has happened with SOPA is that a group of people (a.k.a. corporations) have gotten together to protect their interests, like RIAA. This group of people see that if piracy is allowed to continue, its only a matter of time before what they work so hard to create is simply worthless. They are banding together to protect their industry, their way of earning a living, their way of providing for their families, their way of putting food on their table. That is democracy.
proteusn7xr Says:
Jan 21, 2012 - People do control democracy. Coorporations are just a group of people, a special interest group if you will. Governments are also just a group of people. Groups of people get together and work together to lobby Congress to insure that their interests are protected. These are caled Special Interest Groups or SIGs. Sometimes they are sucessful, sometimes not. Some examples of SIGs: ACLU NAACP SEIU all Unions EAA AOPA AARP You get the point.
proteusn7xr Says:
Jan 21, 2012 - The principles of communism are simple: community property. That means in the purest sense, everything of yours is mine, and everything of mine is yours. From reading these blogs, the attitude of many would seem to suggest that they think that the only purpose of the internet is to share what you have with others. They seem to think that everything on the internet belongs to them. That's simply not the case. This should explain my use of the term "communist".